Software systems are having ever larger and difficult although their Time to Market place (TTM) is shrinking ever shorter. At the very same time the price of failure for the application implementations is finding higher. From the technologies standpoint architecture is the blueprint for the method. Criticality of the architecture piece in the achievement of any IT method necessitates taking all the precautions obtaining it accomplished right the initially time. IT has established itself as a business enterprise enabler and serves as a single of the prime drivers for the enterprise growth. This changed small business landscape, with its higher dependency on IT, demands searching at the architecture improvement approach from a fresh point of view. In this article we will discuss seven of the important practices that are crucial for establishing architectures that survive and succeed.

Thinking THE Organization, IMPLEMENTING THE Technology (1)

Independent investigation groups have identified lack of correct communication involving the several stakeholders as one of the most significant failure aspects for an IT project. The information shows that far more than 50% of the projects that failed could have been saved if the people in the team had taken keen interest in understanding each other. Why there is a lack of effective communication across the group, even when there is a lot of communication going on?

Communication is a automobile to transfer our pondering amongst ourselves. We package our thoughts in the vocabulary and language we comprehend, generally ignoring the fact that the receiver might be having her personal set of vocabulary and language. The which means of what has been communicated could alter drastically following the receiver converts and translates it into her own terms. IT projects are group driven and making a common vocabulary could be a daunting task. Given the heterogeneous nature of the IT teams, it is no wonder that the successful communication is a challenge.

At a higher level any IT project will involve persons from the following groups:

Company Managers: They have the vision of the future. They may well have directional concept of what has to done but could not be exact about how IT can be an enabler for realizing that vision.
Company Users: They know how the company operates and it intricacies, challenges, opportunities, current environment and so forth. They will have an understanding of the management’s vision in enterprise terms but not the technologies that could make it come about.
Project Managers: Men and women who will be executing the project as soon as approved and are additional concerned about the sources, efforts and timelines. They could have thought of the vision of the Organization Managers, but not a lot understanding about the functional and technical elements of the project.
Technologies Individuals: Individuals who recognize the technology and the implementation. They will not have detailed knowledge of the company functions though.
The above descriptions have been framed to make the groups exclusive to highlight the challenges. In actual the group structures and the expertise of the members will differ case to case and may not be this exclusive. As we can observe, each of the groups hold understanding of 1 of the essential pieces and lacks know-how of the other important piece. Manly Architects have to have a prevalent understanding for a project to succeed and to have that they need to speak a prevalent language. This poses a significant challenge as team members do have unique backgrounds, they see the items differently and speak about them differently and have unique focus areas. There are natural hurdles for them even though communicating with every other. So it will have to have conscious work on the components of the organization people to make the technology persons understood what they do mean. This can happen only if the small business is the language spoken and entire team understands it.

There is one more very critical aspect to it. Authorities who are watching the trends and the tech gurus are settling their minds with the reality that the line amongst the small business and IT is disappearing fast. IT is getting into the DNA of the company rather functioning in a silo. Small business and IT are proliferating into each other’s domains so quick that in near future there will be no space that could be mentioned exclusive to either of them. So that as well will necessitate the group to consider in the terms of the small business.

Last but the most essential point is that in the changing organization models, IT Service providers are observed as small business partners and not just vendors who provide services. Service providers do have stakes in the achievement or failures of a project beyond the project implementations. Technologies option providers will need to have to go beyond solving a business enterprise issue and truly see the possibilities of improvements proactively. This can happen only if they have a fair understanding of the company and they speak in the language that business people today understand.